The fossils come from a deep chamber that is accessible only through a very narrow passage, too tough a climb for eminent middle-aged anthropologists. So Berger put out a call for people with both caving and excavation skills who are also skinny enough to fit through a crack only 18 cm (7 inches) wide. With the team assembled, the six skinny cavers (all women) started slithering down into the cave on November 6. They immediately reported dozens of fossils on the surface of a chamber 30 m (100 feet) below the entrance.
Because this is being reported as it happens, there have been no statements from the crew about what these fossils are, how old they are, how they got into the deep chamber (they may have washed in from higher up), or any of the usual pronouncements that accompany the publication of new fossil finds. I think this is wonderful.
Expedition member John Hawks explains how this approach differs from the norm in the field:
The usual approach to paleoanthropology — what I’ll call “legacy paleoanthropology” — is to keep all details quiet until a first publication appears. For a major discovery, that first publication is usually in a high-profile journal like Science or Nature. That publication may be years after the fossils are found.Hawks then answers some of the questions the anthropologists keep getting via twitter. Here is the key one:
The first publication answers those basic questions, “What species is it?” “How old are the fossils?” “How many individuals are there?” The millions of people who follow paleoanthropology usually find out about the research second- or third-hand, by press release.
That highly controlled approach creates the misconception that fossils come out of the ground with labels attached. Or worse, that discovery comes from cloaked geniuses instead of open discussion. We’re hoping to combat these misconceptions by pursuing an open approach. This is today’s evolutionary science, not the science of fifty years ago.
Aren’t you afraid that other scientists will scoop your results? The most important implication of open access is the change in the scientific culture. When you have a culture of secrecy, you breed people who trade in secrets. When you have a culture of openness, you must train people in responsible sharing. Our team and the curatorial practices at the University of the Witwatersrand will facilitate collaboration and sharing of datasets, and we expect the field will embrace these open standards.This is the future of science. The biggest obstacle to progress in many fields is now the need to keep things secret so they can be published in a big journal, and the way forward -- toward better science, more involvement with the public, and a better culture in the scientific community -- is more openness. Plus, it is great to be able to watch the dig unfold instead of having to wait years for the results.
So kudos to National Geographic for supporting this work, and to Lee Berger for deciding to put the future of science above his chance for another big article in Nature.