Some folks these days are arguing that what we need is smaller legislative districts, so that legislators would have closer ties to their constituents. I have seen calls for a US Congress with 50,000 members.
Two economists, Veda Narasimhan & Jeffrey Weaver, realized that India's thousands of local councils provided a way to test this theory, since those councils have widely varying memberships. They find that the size of the council has zero effect on anything:
Political inclusion is widely believed to improve governance, motivating the creation of elected representatives for highly localized constituencies. This paper studies 1.2 million "hyperlocal" representatives across 150,000 local governments in rural India. Exploiting discontinuities that determine the number and identity of these representatives, we assess how expanded representation affects governance outcomes. We find precisely estimated null effects on core functions, including public project management, intermediation in access to benefit programs, alignment of policy with citizen preferences, equity of benefit allocation, and oversight of public finances. These findings highlight the limits of expanding political representation if representative capacity is weak.
















































