Tuesday, September 24, 2019

Tunisia Fast-Forwards its History

The only place where the Arab Spring led to an enduring democratic government is Tunisia. The Tunisian elite is perhaps the most western in the Arab world, and the least Arab; I know a Tunisian man and he once told me, proudly I thought, that his people were "Berber-Phoenician-Greek-Roman-Arab-Turkish-French, and probably a few other things." Tunisian democracy has gotten this far through a remarkable spirit of compromise and a series of power-sharing agreements between the two main parties: Ennahda, a conservative Islamic party that has consistently gotten the most votes in Parliamentary elections, and Tahya Tounes (Long Live Tunisia), the secular party that has the most support in the urban middle class and has led all the governments so far.

The news out of the first round of presidential voting last week seems to be that Tunisian voters are already tired of bland, compromising centrism and looking for something new. The candidates from Ennahda and Tahya Tounes both failed to make the second round; instead the candidates will be a lawyer who says he has never voted before and a local media mogul in jail on charges of tax evasion:
There have been warning signs that this politics of consensus would prove hollow. There has been a sharp decline in public confidence in political institutions: Trust in parliament has fallen to 14 percent, and trust in political parties stands at just 9 percent, according to a recent Arab Barometer survey. That explains the low turnout for the Sept. 15 vote. Tunisians have been making their political claims through street protests: There have been up to 10,000 protests every year since 2016.
As to why, well
Promises of economic recovery have not been fulfilled, and both unemployment and inflation remain high. . . . Many Tunisians hope that this public rejection of the political elite will reset the system and revive the promises of the 2011 uprising for accountable, legitimate government and wider economic opportunities for all.
I have to think that globalization is also involved. Tunisians follow the news from Europe closely, so they know that Europeans are not at all satisfied with their own blandly centrist governments.

Democracy is a balancing act. For it to work, the voters have to demand accountability; otherwise it slides into corruption and back room dealing. But if what the voters are demanding is simply not possible, that won't work either, opening the way to grandstanding liars (ahem) and authoritarianism. The things Tunisian voters are said to be demanding make me nervous.

1 comment:

G. Verloren said...

"Promises of economic recovery have not been fulfilled, and both unemployment and inflation remain high. . . . Many Tunisians hope that this public rejection of the political elite will reset the system and revive the promises of the 2011 uprising for accountable, legitimate government and wider economic opportunities for all."

"The things Tunisian voters are said to be demanding make me nervous."

They made Depression Era politicians nervous too, before Roosevelt and the New Deal.

People can't live in a society where there's no work and money is worthless. We know how to combat those issues, but it involves taking government-led measures that are unpopular with the rich. Tunisia could take the needed steps to slash unemployment and inflation, but the wealthy elites would complain, and so nothing changes.

But that's exactly what the rich want - status quo. Centrists in a broken system, opposing change that would help others because they don't want to lose the power and privilege which the system brokenly grants them.

I can understand the corrupt aristocracy of modern society being made nervous by calls for employment, deflation, and political accountability. But you?