But why are richer people healthier than poor people? The authors think the reason is stress. They report that "biomarkers of stress" are worse for poor people than rich people, and furthermore that the difference has gotten much bigger over time. You can see this in the graph above. But the main thing that jumps out at me from this graph is how much worse these biomarkers have gotten since the 1970s. According to this, rich people today are much less stressed than poor people, but on the other hand they are much more stressed than poor people were in the 1970s.
Can that be right? I'm dubious. So I checked to see what these "biomarkers of stress" are:
diastolic and systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, and cholesterol (cardiovascular risk), creatinine (kidney function), and albumin (liver function)The authors say these are commonly used markers of stress, but they look to me more like general indications of health. On the other hand rich people today report being healthier than poor people used to, so that isn't quite right, either.
I don't know what to make of this. But if it's really true that whatever is making poor and middle class people less healthy than rich people has gotten much worse since the 1970s, that could explain a lot.
No comments:
Post a Comment