Interesting article in Upshot about how liberals and conservatives consume the news. The main discovery is that despite everything you read about how the media have changed and echo chambers and so on, most Americans still get their news from the same mainstream sources. Also, the number of conservatives who rely on conservative sources is greater than the number of liberals who rely on liberal sources.
Is that a reasonable way to assess the content of a publication as big and fact-filled as the Times? The Times is certainly liberal, but it is also a great newspaper, in terms of spending money to cover issues that matter, and giving them space in its pages. It also covers things like theater and dance better than any other paper I know of, and it has some great science writers. Conservatives who won't read it because of the liberal slant are missing out. And, you know, the Times is not that far left; they despised Bernie, and real socialists hate the Times as much as Breitbart readers do. The Times is the neoliberal newspaper, not the leftist one.
The named publication that takes up the farthest left slot is Talking Points Memo (TPM), which is also strange. TPM is certainly on the left, but it is not the place you go to get your daily dose of outrage at crazy conservatives. It is aimed at Democratic activists and professionals, the sort of people who want to follow the ins and outs of competitive House races in Florida. So, yes, there are "Trump is Crazy" stories to enliven things, but the meat of the publication is stuff political insiders need to know, like which Super-pacs have decided to take out ad buys on behalf of whom, and whose campaign might be derailed by a scandal.
So I don't like this attempt at a political news spectrum at all. It shows something about who reads each publication, but not what is in it.