I asked the president if, in retrospect, he should have provided more help to Syria’s rebels earlier in their struggle. “I think those who believe that two years ago, or three years ago, there was some swift resolution to this thing had we acted more forcefully, fundamentally misunderstand the nature of the conflict in Syria and the conditions on the ground there,” Obama said. “When you have a professional army that is well-armed and sponsored by two large states who have huge stakes in this, and they are fighting against a farmer, a carpenter, an engineer who started out as protesters and suddenly now see themselves in the midst of a civil conflict -- the notion that we could have, in a clean way that didn’t commit U.S. military forces, changed the equation on the ground there was never true.”I agree completely.
Tuesday, March 4, 2014
The President Dismisses Intervention in Syria
Jeffrey Goldberg interviewed President Obama last week about Middle Eastern affairs. Two things come through very clearly: he is exasperated with the Israeli government, and happy not to be involved in the Syrian Civil War:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment