data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ec32/3ec322f87df1c1cea15a7d17261d64697f3ca47a" alt=""
My objections to it are 1) it's ugly, and 2) it's completely unlivable. The original owner was a sort of half-mad ascetic who enjoyed the rigor of living in a glass cube. When British magnate Peter Palumbo bought it, mostly as a place to show off his sculpture collection, he made major changes (including curtains) but still found it impossibly uncomfortable to stay in this masterpiece for more than a day or two. And this is the thing that drives me crazy about architects. A house is a place to live, not a sculpture or a statement about artistic values. So as far as I am concerned, a house that nobody wants to live in is a failure, no matter how cool it looks.
And, as we have recently discovered, the house isn't sited very well.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19945/199458a8146ce65d7315961c806dc816e2c7d7fe" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment