The theme of Bahrampour's essay is that the generation's problem is the collapse of high expectations. For some it was the expectation that the counter culture would really change things:
Last spring, Frank Turkaly tried to kill himself. A retiree in a Pittsburgh suburb living on disability checks, he was estranged from friends and family, mired in credit card debt and taking medication for depression, cholesterol, diabetes and high blood pressure. It was not the life he had envisioned as a young man in the 1960s and ’70s, when “people were more in tune with each other, people were more prone to help each other,” said Turkaly, 63, who owned a camera shop and later worked at Sears. “There was not this big segregation between the poor and the rich. . . . I thought it was going to continue the same, I didn’t think it was going to change.”This deep sadness over the failure of the 60s to change our society in fundamental ways seems to me to be common, at least, I personally know three or four people whose outlooks on life and politics are still overshadowed by the loss of that youthful promise.
For others the loss has been a sense of empowerment and possibility. Bob Knight, USC psychologist:
There was an illusion of choice — where people thought they’d be able to re-create themselves again and again. These people feel a greater sense of disappointment because their expectations of leading glorious lives didn’t come to fruition.Instead, as Bahrampour puts it,
compared with their parents’ generation, boomers have higher rates of obesity, prescription and illicit drug abuse, alcoholism, divorce, depression and mental disorders.This leads to a second point, which is that many aging baby boomers find themselves alone. What sustains people through the hard parts of life is mainly connections to other people. In pursuit of self actualization, many baby boomers did not develop those ties. The surge in divorce is one key part of this; another is the "bowling alone" phenomenon, the decline of social groups from the Masons to the Junior League. Baby boomers are much less likely than previous generations to feel that they are part of a strong community.
Some of Bahrampour's sources are a little scornful of baby boomers, implying that because they had such easy young lives they are not now tough enough to handle the pains of aging. I think that is wrong; one thing we know about this generation is that all of its problems are worse among those who served in Vietnam than among those who did not. It is also wrong to blame geographical mobility, since Baby Boomers were no more likely to move to another state than nineteenth-century Americans. Barhampour also does not deal with the fading of religion in this generation, and thus of the strong religious taboo against suicide.
But I was moved to write this from a strong sense that her argument about high expectations has something to it. I think it is dangerous to put too much stress on the possibilities of the future, without enough of a foundation in the strengths of the past. Family, community, faith, and skilled work were not the insidious creations of reactionary patriarchs, and in all likelihood the future is not going to be a self-actualized paradise. Instead of hippies these days we have techno- libertarians, but they are making the same mistake that many baby-boomers did. Self-empowerment, the breaking of the bonds that held past generations down, can all too easily lead only to futile loneliness.
4 comments:
Ah, John,
You put way to much faith in the infotainment business.
If the increase in suicides is due to aging, disappointed (spoiled) baby boomers, you have to ask why the greatest increase has been among what the study calls "NA/AN" -- Native Americans, Alaska Natives.
It's fun to think in stereotypes but nothing in the numbers indicates former hippies -- whatever that means -- are disproportionately represented.
What the original report and the WP story both point out, is that suicide rates go up during times of economic downturn. As I mentioned here before, there's no reason to believe the 2007/2008 crisis has been less devastating than the Great Depression, and it's still going on.
Indeed, the outlook is much worse now. In the '30s we still had huge oil reserves in the ground and our manufacturing hadn't yet moved offshore; railroad track was still being laid, and our shipping/ship-building industry was strong. Our economy was still based on old-fashioned commerce rather than scam finance.
Your dad's generation had every reason to believe it would be better off than your granddad's, and it was.
More accurate coroner's reports may also play a part. In past times a suicide was often seen as shameful, something to be covered up out of sympathy for the family. Men and women were more likely to "fall" off bridges or out of windows, especially if loved ones hid the final note.
On top of this, until fairly recently many toxins were difficult to detect, and unless foul play was suspected it was easier just to put down heart-failure than go to the trouble and expense of unreliable tests.
Just the same, I'd guess I too like the WP entertainment slant better than facts. I've always resented those beaded, flower-in-the-hair, happy, dope and music loving, easy sex, no-goods who lived their youth for the fun of it instead of putting on ties and selling shoes. I knew they'd come to a sorry end.
Well, actually, I guess most of them went on and got conventional jobs and had families, just like everyone else. Still, I can't forgive them for the fun they had. Some even backpacked around the world when you could live cheap in Paris for $5 a day.
I can't forgive that.
Suicides among baby boomers have been higher than for other generations in every period, including 1995 to 1999. The recession made things worse, but did not create the problem.
We've been over this before but our economy is not worse than it was in the 1930s -- in 1930, unemployment in Detroit was 85 percent. US economic output fell by 35 percent in three years. Several hundred people starved to death in NYC alone. I personally think we have technologies coming online -- genetic engineering especially -- that will lead to a great productive burst. How much that will benefit poor Americans remains to be seen, but we are by any standard absurdly wealthy.
You have to remember that both David and I are medieval historians, and compared to medieval people we leads lives of extraordinary luxury.
John, have we been over this before? Sorry for not remembering.
Actually Detroit's unemployment rate was 45% in 1932, the worst year of the depression. Same as it is now. You can follow this link or Goggle it yourself.
http://salempress.com/store/samples/thirties_in_america/thirties_in_america_unemployment.htm
Not sure what David (?) or the middle ages have to do with the the Great Depression or current economic situation.
I guess when you only have a medieval hammer everything looks like a medieval nail.
But yes, I hope anyone considering suicide should first reflect on how much better off they are than most people in the Middle Ages who didn't take their own lives.
Gee, just think, now that I've written you off as a harmless moron, that leaves just David (?) to comment. Your Web traffic's just been cut in half. (Smiley face.)
what a troll. i didn't feel that some conclusions in the post were well-supported, but i've not vomited invective. it's amazing how the relative anonymity of online posting emboldens some.
Post a Comment