Saturday, February 4, 2023

The Investor

The mature young gentleman is a gentleman of property. He invests his property. He goes, in a condescending amateurish way, into the City, attends meetings of Directors, and has to do with traffic in Shares. As is well known to the wise in their generation, traffic in Shares is the one thing to have to do with in this world. Have no antecedents, no established character, no cultivation, no ideas, no manners; have Shares. Have Shares enough to be on Boards of Direction in capital letters, oscillate on mysterious business between London and Paris, and be great. Where does he come from? Shares. Where is he going to? Shares. What are his tastes? Shares. Has he any principles? Shares. What squeezes him into Parliament? Shares. Perhaps he never of himself achieved success in anything, never originated anything, never produced anything? Sufficient answer to all; Shares.  

– Charles Dickens, Our Mutual Friend

And one more bit of this book:

Mr Podsnap was well to do, and stood very high in Mr Podsnap’s opinion.

That's the thing with Dickens; the plots are mostly riduculous, and this one seems especially contrived and silly, but there's a line like that on almost every page.

4 comments:

Shadow said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Shadow said...

Yes, lines like that. His narrators are never boring, and his characters are always memorable. I think chapter 10 of Little Dorrit is filled with some of the finest satire ever written. That's the chapter that describes the workings of the Circumlocution Office -- how not to get things done. I believe he created over 9,000 characters over the course of his life, some of them having no names yet remembered nonetheless.

After reading a book I sometimes wonder how different the story would have been had the plot remained the same, but Dickens had done the narration and the character descriptions instead. A good example is Maugham's matter-of-fact, very boring narration in Of Human Bondage. The final result probably would have been preposterous, but I would have enjoyed it all the more.

Shadow said...

The Guardian quotes 989 named characters and over 13,000 individuals.
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/shortcuts/2015/dec/20/dickensian-bbc1-literary-characters-live-forever

G. Verloren said...

Words written in 1864 or 1865 which sound like they could have been written today. What a sad state of affairs.