Matt Yglesias responds to a guy who noted that the more Trump is restrained by outside forces, the more popular he is:
You see in every poll that a huge share of the population is absolutely fed up with the status quo, hates the establishment wants to see major changes to our political and economic system, and has a deep yearning for politicians who'll "get things done" and deliver change.
At the same time, *in practice* if you look at hyper-constrained elected officials like Phil Scott in Vermont or Andy Beshear in Kentucky — guys facing massive opposition party legislative majorities that make action borderline impossible — voters love those guys. [JCB: The most popular governor in Maryland's history was Larry Hogan when he was in the hospital getting cancer treatment.]
As @lionel_trolling was saying, beyond the atmospherics Trump consistently gets higher marks from the public when his bark is louder than his bite. Actually implementing sweeping MAGA-style policy change alarms people.
But you see similar thermostatic backlash to the implementation of actual progressive policy change. Scott [a Republican] became governor of Vermont in the first place because they tried to do Medicare for All. The blue trifecta in Minnesota collapsed after Tim Walz signed a bunch of bills.
I think it is largely reasonable for Americans to be risk-averse in their attitude toward policy change — we live in basically the richest society of all time — but it's hard to square that practical skepticism of change with the equally real intense demand for sweeping change.
Is it ever.
"Hey Johnny, what are you rebelling against?"
ReplyDelete"Whaddya got?"