D'Annunzio first rose to fame as a poet of the Decadent school, allied to the French Symbolists and other literary bad boys of the late nineteenth century. Here is one of his verses, which I found posted without title, date, or translator's name:
There murmur swarming through my drowsy headOr this, which is from the Intermezzo de Rime of 1883, translated by Luciano Mangiafico
In this vast furnace of a summer day
Relentless verses clamoring to be said,
As beetles round a putrid carcass play.
I search with open mouth and burning breath
A little coolness on the shadowed sward,
Beyond, the Adriatic, still as death,
Shows dreadful dazzlings like an unsheathed sword.
Far in the cloudless sky, malignly fair
And motionless, the sea gulls disappear
Without a cry in far-off whitish throngs;
And now and then, through odors of salt air,
Like voices of the ship-wrecked, dim with fear,
Tremble the weary wings of dying songs.
As from corrupted flesh the over boldIn the 1890s he turned to novels and wrote more than a dozen of those. For a time he was Italy's most famous writer, much praised by Proust, James Joyce, Henry James, and others of Europe's literary elite. He used his fame and poetic skill to become a famous lover as well -- yes, in Italy you can (or could, anyway) become a famous lover. These are from a review in the TLS of a new biography of d'Annunzio by Lucy Hughes-Hallett:
Young vines in dense luxuriance rankly grow
And strange weird plants their horrid buds unfold
O’er the foul rotting of a corpse below…
Even so within my heart malignant flowers
Of verse swell forth…
The dancer Isadora Duncan found her emotional defences crumbling in the face of his verbal sallies as she walked with him in a French forest: "Oh Isadora . . . All other women destroy the landscape. You alone are part of it. You are part of the trees the sky, you are the supreme Goddess of Nature." "What woman," she confessed, "could stand up against such flattery?"When D'Annunzio read Nietzsche, he immediately announced that he was the superman.
. . . D'Annunzio in Paris in 1910 throwing himself at the feet of the Russian dancer Ida Rubinstein and kissing her famous long legs from ankle to crotch -- to the consternation of Maurice Barres, Edmond Rostand and luminaries standing by. . . .
The allied victory in the war led to territorial gains for Italy, but not so great as many Italian nationalists hoped. One of the places not granted to Italy was the city of Fiume, now in Croatia, which had an Italian majority. In 1919 D'Annunzio led a band of about two thousand patriots to the city and proclaimed it part of Italy. He mobilized the people of the city through marches, rallies, and fiery speeches delivered from balconies. When the Italian government refused to ratify his seizure, he declared Fiume independent. Eventually, though, the Italians blockaded the city and bombarded it from the sea, and the patriots gave up and went home.
This act had a huge influence on Italy's growing fascist movement. The fascists loved "action," and wanted to be led by men of action. Fiume seemed to them to show what bold men would be capable of, if they could oust the Byzantine bureaucrats from their control of the state. For a time D'Annunzio was a rival to Mussolini for the leadership of the party. In the end, though, he was too poetic, impractical, and drug-addled to assume that role. Fascists instead honored him as their "John the Baptist," the one who proclaimed the way that Mussolini followed. At D'Annunzio's funeral in 1938, Mussolini vowed, "Italy will arrived at the summit you dreamed of."
Instead Italy was battered to pieces between the Wehrmacht and the Anglo-American war machine, and D'Annunzio's calls to greatness were seen by almost everyone as both crazy and wrong. Once so popular and praised, he is now hardly read. His most innocuous lyrics seem tainted with fascism and defeat, his novels little more than extended speeches. John Woodhouse wrote of him,
D’Annunzio’s sole concern was self-gratification and glory: to make his existence as interesting and preferably as joyful as possible for himself, whatever the consequences for others; to create a work of art from his life and to immortalize it in words.D'Annunzio revolts, but fascinates; his biographers admit that he was a horrible person but still feel compelled to write about him. He has a big internet presence in both Italian and English. He lived the life that most of us are too -- what? -- to live. Too good and caring? Or too frightened? He has the Jesse James appeal of the rule-breaking rebel, but also great intelligence, literary talent, and enough political skill to have made him the liberator of Fiume. As an artist he won both financial success and the praise of literary greats. He seduced, he said, a thousand women, and nobody seems to doubt him. He lived as he wished, everyone else be damned.
Is there anything about D'Annunzio's life that is not pure pose? That story of Isidora Duncan seems as devoid of genuine sensuality as a cold marble nude.
ReplyDeleteIt is certainly tempting to say that if a person is perennially the object of revolted fascination, part of the reason is the viewer's envy of a life he or she is just too *something* to live. But if that is so, surely the same must be said of Ed Gein and Charlie Manson and such types, whose internet followings I suspect dwarf D'Annunzio's.
Yes, he has much in common with Jesse James, Manson, and other psychopaths, and also with famous frauds like Mesmer. But he was for a time one of the top European artists, and I gather some of his lyrics are very beautiful in the original. He was for a decade a powerful figure in Italian politics. No chickenhawk, he tried to volunteer for the infantry only to be turned away because of his age; nothing daunted, he learned to fly at 52 and became a fighter pilot. As he was honored by the fascists, so you can see some of the fascist impulses in his career -- the love of war and foreign adventure for their own sake, the preference for flamboyant gestures over committee meetings, the demand for bold leadership and "action" rather than economic development. Which raises the question of how much fascism, especially in its Italian and South American forms, was just an expression of his contemptuous personality type.
ReplyDeleteHemingway, who knew him, veered back and forth in his opinion, once damning him for enjoying the deaths of 500,000 Italians in the war, but then a few years later praising him as the only real revolutionary in Italy. Other serious people took him seriously.
So while I agree with you that he was essentially a fraud, he was a very successful one.
Yes, there is much that is obviously heroic about D'Annunzio, as well as frenetic and desperate ("Have I struck the right pose now? How about now?" "Tomorrow, I shall strike my grandest pose ever!" "I've seduced my thousandth woman! Is that enough, daddy?")
ReplyDeleteMy real point is that, if revolted fascination is an index of what we envy, then we envy much that is not obviously heroic. Perhaps ultimately what we envy in both D'Annunzio and Ed Gein is their childlike extremism and obviousness.
No doubt you are right, with D'Annunzio's art and political prominence providing highbrow cover.
ReplyDeleteI'm right, I'm right! (Is that enough, daddy?)
ReplyDeleteI don't agree with the premise that we only view D'Annunzio with "revolted fascination." He had some negative qualities (as we all do) but his positive qualities far outweighed those that the majority of us have in terms of talent, intellect, wonder, and courage. Get a grip--he was no Ed Gein or Charles Manson. The comparison is absolutely ridiculous, no matter how eloquently you phrase the argument. D'Annunzio lived a life many of us would envy, if we're honest with ourselves. I appreciate the take on D'Annunzio in this blog post and thank you for writing it! The comments, not so much. A fraud? Again, get a grip. He DID actually write dozens of books of poetry, drama, and fiction. He DID rule Fiume for a year. He DID fight in wars. He DID have many lovers and admirers. He WAS a rival to Mussolini and threatened his power so much that it's rumored that he killed him in the end. How can you call him a fraud?
ReplyDeleteAlthough I wasn't the one to call D'Annunzio a fraud, I would stand by my comments, happily gripping them. D'Annunzio life--and especially, many of his admirers' way of recounting it--still seems to me the desperate, frenetic, pathetic quest of an inwardly self-hating and somewhat empty personality. I DID rule Fiume! I DID! I DID!
ReplyDelete