tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8304928500646903522.post24643276327463217..comments2024-03-28T18:32:05.933-04:00Comments on bensozia: More Nonsense about the Number 13Johnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01037215533094998996noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8304928500646903522.post-27437764816435511442018-07-15T03:59:00.237-04:002018-07-15T03:59:00.237-04:00In Spain the unlucky day is tuesday the 13th. But...In Spain the unlucky day is tuesday the 13th. But thanks to that i’ve learned about Paraskavedekatriaphobia.... I loved triskaidekaphobia, but maybe i’ve to make a space for that new one. n13Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8304928500646903522.post-65113383542553363042018-07-13T15:47:31.898-04:002018-07-13T15:47:31.898-04:00For what it's worth, despite not being previou...For what it's worth, despite not being previously aware of the Babyonian astronomy treatise you mention in the other post, I immediately suspected as I was reading that the answer must be based in lunar months being a bit too short to coincide neatly with solar years.<br /><br />I have to admit, I experience similar frustration when people harp on about Star Wars, and how the Kessel Run is measured in lightyears. <i>"A lightyear is a unit of distance, not time! How stupid can you get?"</i><br /><br />None of them realize that there's a long tradition of measuring trips not by the amount of time they take, but by the number of miles (or other units of distance) that they can be completed in. Where does that work out? In situations where there's no single set route, and different branches of the route can be taken at different times depending on current conditions.<br /><br />And where do you find that sort of situation? Well, at the very least in sailing down rivers like the Mississippi, particularly in the heyday of steamboats. You see, the Mississippi used to have a habit of cutting itself off as waterways shifted due to things like rain and floods.<br /><br />When the river makes a big horseshoe loop around for many miles, there's the potentiality of a shortcut. The shortest route would normally not be useable, because it would require taking the boat over what is normally dry land. But if the river floods and spills its banks, those little channels, valleys, and other shortcuts can actually become full of water deep enough to take a steamboat across, and you can shave many miles off the trip distance.<br /><br />Of course, this came with considerable danger - many steamboats got stranded in shortcuts that were too shallow to clear the bottom, or too narrow to slip through without wedging in, or that had treacherous obstacles like rocks or trees to tear out the bottoms of steamboats, leaving them permanently grounded well above the normal height of the river once the water receded. Only the most skillful pilots could risk taking shortcut after shortcut to set records on how short of a trip they could make between one river port and another.<br /><br />The same system of measuring trips by shortest distance could also be used in contexts like sailing through short-lived openings in arctic ice. Or, as they use it in Star Wars, in the context of traveling a shipping route through dangerous interstellar regions, passing closer than usual to hazards like black holes, or cutting through asteroid fields that you would normally take the time to go around.<br /><br />There are just some things that the majority of people are going to continually keep insisting don't make sense or have no answer, despite the actual answer being definitively known. It's just a glitch in the Matrix, I guess.G. Verlorennoreply@blogger.com